The Evolution of Complexity - Abstracts.

Use Of Complex Adaptive Systems In Organizational Studies

By E. Andres Garcia
  • New York University
  • Stern School of Business
  • Department of Management
  • 44 West 4 Street, Suite 7-158
  • New York, NY 10012-1126
  • USA
  • 212-995-4234
  • 212-998-0217
  • Abstract:

    Organizations and other social systems can be viewed as complex systems which continually generate, elaborate, and rearrange patterns of meanings (e.g., common norms, values, worldviews and perceptions) and interactions (Buckley, 1967). Mechanisms or institutions spontaneously emerge and evolve, facilitating in a dynamic, distributed, mutually causal, and unintended manner:

    - negotiation of interpretations and attribution of meaning

    - coordination of expectations

    - interplay of cooperation and competition

    - diffusion of information and innovations

    - creation of individual knowledge

    - codification of collective knowledge The conceptual framework or "paradigm" of complex adaptive systems (and related ideas such as self-organization and chaos theory) thus appears to be ideal for use in the field of organizational and managerial studies. Yet this new paradigm has not penetrated very deeply into the field. The knowledge diffusion process may first require that the basic concepts be introduced to a new audience in an accessible language, followed by their use metaphorically. Only then can one attempt to operationalize the concepts for mapping the theoretical framework to the real world and for empirical testing.

    Concepts associated with systems theory and cybernetics have been around the longest and thus appear to have already gone through the above progression, becoming incorporated into the mainstream of organizational and managerial studies, for instance, in works by Forrester (1961), Buckley (1966), Weick (1979), Masuch (1985), Morgan (1986), and Senge (1990). Complex adaptive systems and related concepts as metaphors for organizations have been explored by Morgan (1986), Wheatley (1992), Daft & Lengel (1993), and Polley (1993), among others. However, there have only been limited attempts to operationalize these concepts, such as: for chaos theory, by Richards (1990), Gregersen & Sailer (1993), and Parker & Stacey (1994); for self-organization by Drazin & Sandelands (1992); and for complex systems by Sterman (1989) and Senge (1990).

    This paper will examine key concepts associated with complex adaptive systems, their relationship to each other, and their utility for organizational and managerial studies. An attempt will be made to operationalize each of the key concepts for use by researchers, including: self-organization; mutual/reciprocal causality; nonlinearity/ discontinuities/ thresholds; path-dependency and sensitivity to initial conditions; "chaos" and "order" at different levels of analysis; criticality; fractal structure; hierarchically nested spatial/temporal cycles; disequilibrium/"far- from-equilibrium" dynamics; and system evolution/co-evolution.

  • Abraham, Ralph H. (1987), "Dynamics and Self-Organization," in Self Organizing Systems: The Emergence of Order, F. Eugene Yates [Ed.], NY: Plenum Press
  • Anderson, Philip W., Kenneth J. Arrow, and David Pines [Eds.] (1988), The
  • Economy as an Evolving Complex System, Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Arthur, W. Brian (1989), "Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-in by Historical Events," The Economic Journal, Vol. 99, March, 116 131.
  • Arthur, W. Brian (1990), "Positive Feedbacks in the Economy," Scientific American, February, 92-99.
  • Ayres, Robert U. (1990), "Self-Organization and Technological Change in the Economic System," in Organization and Change in Complex Systems, Marcelo Alonso [Ed.], NY: Paragon House, 204-224.
  • Bak, Per and Kan Chen (1991), "Self-Organized Criticality," Scientific American, January, 46-53.
  • Baumol, William J. and Jess Benhabib (1989), "Chaos: Significance, Mechanism, and Economic Applications," Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 3, No. 1, Winter, 77-105.
  • Berger, Peter L. and Thomas Luckmann (1966), The Social Construction of Reality, New York: Doubleday.
  • von Bertalanffy, Ludwig (1973), General System Theory (Revised Edition), New York: George Braziller.
  • Binswanger, Mathias (1993), "From Microscopic to Macroscopic Theories: Entropic Aspects of Ecological and Economic Processes," Ecological Economics, 8, 209-234.
  • Buckley, Walter (1967), Sociology and Modern Systems Theory, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Capra, Fritjof (1993), "A Systems Approach to the Emerging Paradigm," in The New Paradigm in Business, Michael Ray & Alan Rinzler (World Business Academy) [Eds.], NY: Jeremy P. Tarcher/Perigee Books, 230-237.
  • Checkland, Peter (1981), Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Costanza, Robert, Lisa Wainger, Carl Folke, and Karl-Goran Maler (1993), "Modeling Complex Ecological Economic Systems," BioScience, Vol. 43, No. 8, September, 545-555.
  • Daft, Richard L. and Robert H. Lengel (1993), "The Challenge of Chaos," The Owen Manager, Vol. 14, No. 2, Spring, 2-7.
  • D'Aveni, Richard A. (1994), Hypercompetition, New York: The Free Press.
  • Drazin, Robert and Lloyd Sandelands (1992), "Autogenesis: A Perspective on the Process of Organizing," Organization Science, Vol. 3, No. 2, May, 230-249.
  • Forrester, Jay W. (1961), Industrial Dynamics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Forrester, Jay W. (1968), Principles of Systems, Cambridge, MA: Wright-Allen Press.
  • Freedman, David H. (1992), "Is Management Still a Science?" Harvard Business Review, Nov.-Dec., 26-38.
  • Giddens, Anthony (1984), The Constitution of Society, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Gladwin, Thomas N. (1993), "Envisioning the Sustainable Corporation," in Managing for Environmental Excellence: The Next Business Frontier, Emily T. Smith [Ed.], Wash., D.C.: Island Press
  • Gleick, James (1987), Chaos: Making a New Science, New York: Penguin Books.
  • Gregersen, Hal and Lee Sailer (1993), "Chaos Theory and its Implications for Social Science Research," Human Relations, Vol. 46, No. 7, 777-802.
  • Hejl, Peter M. (1990), "Self-Regulation in Social Systems," in Selforganization: Portrait of a Scientific Revolution, W. Krohn, G. Kuppers & H. Nowotny [Eds.], Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer, 114-127.
  • Holling, C.S. (1994), "New Science and New Investments for a Sustainable Biosphere," in Investing in Natural Capital: The Ecological Economic Approach to Sustainability, A.M. Jansson, C. Folke, R. Costanza, & M. Hammer [Eds.], Wash., D.C.: Island Press, 57-73.
  • Jantsch, Erich (1980), The Self-Organizing Universe, Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  • Lavoie, Don (1989), "Economic Chaos or Spontaneous Order? Implications for Political Economy of The New View of Science," Cato Journal, Vol. 8, No. 3, Winter, 613-635.
  • Maruyama, Magoroh (1963), "The Second Cybernetics: Deviation- Amplifying Mutual Causal Processes," American Scientist, Vol. 51, No. 2, June, 164-179.
  • Masuch, Michael (1985), "Vicious Circles in Organizations," Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, March, 14-33.
  • Morgan, Gareth (1986), Images of Organization, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Ott, Edward (1993), Chaos in Dynamical Systems, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Parker, David and Ralph Stacey (1994), Chaos, Management and Economics: The Implications of Non-Linear Thinking, London: Institute of Economic Affairs- Hobart Paper 125.
  • Polley, Douglas (1993), "Chaos as Metaphor and Science: Applications and Risks," Paper presented at the 1993 Academy of Management annual meeting.
  • Richards, D. (1990), "Is Strategic Decision Making Chaotic?", Behavioral Science, Vol. 35, 219-232.
  • Schelling, Thomas C. (1978), Micromotives and Macrobehavior, NY: W.W. Norton.
  • Senge, Peter (1990), The Fifth Discipline, New York: Doubleday/Currency.
  • Sterman, John D. (1989), "Misperceptions of Feedback in Dynamic Decision Making," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 301-335.
  • Sterman, John D. (forthcoming), "Learning in and about Complex Systems," System Dynamics Review.
  • Stites, Janet (1994), "Complexity," Omni, May, 42-50.
  • Waldrop, W. Mitchell (1994), Complexity, New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Weick, Karl E. (1979), The Social Psychology of Organizing (2nd Edition), New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Wheatley, Margaret J. (1992), Leadership and the New Science: Learning About Organization from an Orderly Universe, San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.